Evaluation of Osseointegration of Trabecular Titanium Implants Produced with Porous Metal Technology: An Experimental Study

Abstract

Trabecular titanium (TM) implants produced with porous metal technology are used in dental implant treatments due to their resemblance to cancellous bone and their physical and mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to perform a histological assessment and comparison of the bone–implant contact (BIC) rates between trabecular metal (TM) implants and conventionally machined-surface implants in rat femurThe study was conducted using twenty healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were randomly allo- cated into two equal groups: one serving as the control group and the other receiving trabecular metal (TM) implants. All im- plants were surgically placed into the right femora of the rats. A curved incision approximately 10-15 mm long was made on the anterolateral aspect of the right knee. The knee joint cap- sule, formed by the femur and tibia, was dissected. Following this procedure, the patella was subluxed, exposing the inter- condylar fossa of the femur for implant placement. Following a 4-week healing period, undecalcified histomorphometric analyses of the samples were performed. BIC (%) measure- ments were conducted in the histomorphometric evaluations. Group comparisons were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. TM implants exhibited an average BIC of 37.13%, while stan- dard cylindrical implants had an average BIC of 29.13%, with a significant statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Within the limitation of this study titanium implants produced with TM technology have higher percentages of BIC than standard cylindrical titanium implants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yang BC, Zhou XD, Yu HY, Wu Y, Bao CY, Man Y, Cheng L, Sun Y. Advances in titanium dental implant surface modification. West China Journal of Stomatology. [Internet]. 2019; 37(2):124-129. doi: https://doi.org/g65h4g

Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent. Mater. J. [Internet]. 2020; 39(2):167-172. doi: https://doi.org/gqnkzm

Albrektsson T, Buser D, Sennerby L. Crestal bone loss and oral implants. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. [Internet]. 2012; 14(6):783-791. doi: https://doi.org/f22q7f

Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol. 2000. [Internet]. 2017; 73(1):7-21. doi: https://doi.org/f3t8sz

Annunziata M, Guida L. The Effect of Titanium Surface Modifications on Dental Implant Osseointegration. Front. Oral Biol. [Internet]. 2015; 17:62-77. doi: https://doi.org/pzwk

Le Guehennec L, Goyenvalle E, Lopez-Heredia MA, Weiss P, Amouriq Y, Layrolle P. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Clin. Oral Implants Res. [Internet]. 2008; 19(11):1103-1110. doi: https://doi.org/bxgbv2

Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. [Internet]. 2007; 23(7):844-854. doi: https://doi.org/b2rw2d

Dundar S, Yaman F, Gecor O, Cakmak O, Kirtay M, Yildirim TT, Karaman T, Benlidayi ME. Effects of Local and Systemic Zoledronic Acid Application on Titanium Implant Osseointegration: An Experimental Study Conducted on Two Surface Types. J. Craniofac. Surg. [Internet]. 2017; 28(4):935-938. doi: https://doi.org/gbh973

Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, Kloss F, Gröbe A, Heiland M, Ebker T. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. Biomed. Res. Int. [Internet]. 2016; 2016:6285620. doi: https://doi.org/f9jp5f

Stanford CM. Surface modifications of dental implants. Aust Dent J. [Internet]. 2008; 53(Suppl1):S26-S33. doi: https://doi.org/bgsg5v

Bencharit S, Byrd WC, Altarawneh S, Hosseini B, Leong A, Reside G, Morelli T, Offenbacher S. Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal- enhanced titanium dental implants. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. [Internet]. 2014; 16(6):817-826. doi: https://doi.org/gp3dgq

Velasco-Ortega E, Ortiz-Garcia I, Jiménez-Guerra A, Núñez-Márquez E, Moreno-Muñoz J, Rondón-Romero JL, Cabanillas-Balsera D, Gil J, Muñoz-Guzón F, Monsalve- Guil L. Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. [Internet]. 2021; 22(16):8507. doi: https://doi.org/gp5nmb

Yeo IL. Modifications of Dental Implant Surfaces at the Micro- and Nano-Level for Enhanced Osseointegration. Materials. [Internet]. 2020; 13(1):89. doi: https://doi.org/gmwpwg

Blatt S, Pabst AM, Schiegnitz E, Hosang M, Ziebart T, Walter C, Al-Nawas B, Klein MO. Early cell response of osteogenic cells on differently modified implant surfaces: Sequences of cell proliferation, adherence and modified implant surfaces: Sequences of cell proliferation, adherence and differentiation. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. [Internet]. 2018; 46(3):453-460. doi: https://doi.org/gc4zdt

Luke Yeo IS. Dental Implants: Enhancing Biological Response Through Surface Modifications. Dent. Clin. North. Am. [Internet]. 2022; 66(4):627-642. doi: https://doi.org/gtq9h2

Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Sacks D, Calvo-Guirado JL. Influence of the implant diameter and bone quality on the primary stability of porous tantalum trabecular metal dental implants: an in vitro biomechanical study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. [Internet]. 2018; 29(6):649-655. doi: https://doi.org/pzwn

Bencharit S, Morelli T, Barros S, Seagroves JT, Kim S, Yu N, Byrd K, Brenes C, Offenbacher S. Comparing Initial Wound Healing and Osteogenesis of Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metal and Titanium Alloy Materials. J. Oral. Implantol. [Internet]. 2019; 45(3):173-180. doi: https://doi.org/pzwp

de Arriba CC, Alobera Gracia MA, Coelho PG, Neiva R, Tarnow DP, Del Canto Pingarron M, Aguado-Henche S. Osseoincorporation of Porous Tantalum Trabecular- Structured Metal: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in Humans. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 05 Apr 2025]; 38(6):879–885. Available in: https://goo.su/Ucon1

Özcan EC, Aydin MA, Dundar S, Tanrisever M, Bal A, Karasu N, Kirtay M. Biomechanical Investigation of the Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Surfaces Placed With Allogeneic Bone Transfer. J. Craniofac. Surg. [Internet]. 2024; 35(7):2184-2188. doi: https://doi.org/pmwx

Al Deeb M, Aldosari AA, Anil S. Osseointegration of Tantalum Trabecular Metal in Titanium Dental Implants: Histological and Micro-CT Study. J. Funct. Biomater. [Internet]. 2023; 14(7):355. doi: https://doi.org/pzwr

Dundar S, Yaman F, Bozoglan A, Yildirim TT, Kirtay M, Ozupek MF, Artas G. Comparison of Osseointegration of Five Different Surfaced Titanium Implants. J. Craniofac. Surg. [Internet]. 2018; 29(7):1991-1995. doi: https://doi.org/pmw5

Calvo-Guirado JL, Satorres-Nieto M, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Maté-Sánchez de Val JE, Gargallo- Albiol J, Gómez-Moreno G, Romanos GE. Retraction Note: Influence of surface treatment on osseointegration of dental implants: histological, histomorphometric and radiological analysis in vivo. Clin. Oral Investig. [Internet]. 2024; 28(1):118. doi: https://doi.org/pzws

Kreve S, Ferreira I, da Costa Valente ML, Dos Reis AC. Relationship between dental implant macro-design and osseointegration: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. [Internet]. 2024; 28(1):1-14. doi: https://doi.org/pzwt

Lee JW, Wen HB, Battula S, Akella R, Collins M, Romanos GE. Outcome after placement of tantalum porous engineered dental implants in fresh extraction sockets: a canine study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 05 Apr 2025]; 30(1):134-142. Available in: https://goo.su/4Sps0

Gasbarra E, Iundusi R, Perrone FL, Saturnino L, Tarantino U. Densitometric evaluation of bone remodelling around Trabecular Metal Primary stem: a 24-month follow-up. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. [Internet]. 2015; 27(Suppl 1):S69-S75. doi: https://doi.org/pzww

Fraser D, Mendonca G, Sartori E, Funkenbusch P, Ercoli C, Meirelles L. Bone response to porous tantalum implants in a gap-healing model. Clin. Oral Implants Res. [Internet]. 2019; 30(2):156-168. doi: https://doi.org/gx7ksq

Lee JW, Wen HB, Gubbi P, Romanos GE. New bone formation and trabecular bone microarchitecture of highly porous tantalum compared to titanium implant threads: A pilot canine study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. [Internet]. 2018; 29(2):164-174. doi: https://doi.org/gts25s

Published
2025-08-26
How to Cite
1.
Ozcan EC, Tanrisever M, Aydin Y, Tekin B, Sagsoz A, Bozoglan A, Can UK, Dundar S. Evaluation of Osseointegration of Trabecular Titanium Implants Produced with Porous Metal Technology: An Experimental Study. Rev. Cient. FCV-LUZ [Internet]. 2025Aug.26 [cited 2025Sep.9];35(3):6. Available from: http://195.26.248.148/index.php/cientifica/article/view/44317
Section
Veterinary Medicine